<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RightScale Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rightscale.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rightscale.com</link>
	<description>Cloud Management News &#38; Conversations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightScale Server Orchestration and Amazon SWF launch by Windows Azure and Cloud Computing Posts for 2/20/2012+ - Windows Azure Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/02/22/rightscale-server-orchestration-and-amazon-swf-launch/#comment-4139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Windows Azure and Cloud Computing Posts for 2/20/2012+ - Windows Azure Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1236#comment-4139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] fault-tolerant execution of their server scaling workflow. Read Thorsten von Eicken&#8217;s post, RightScale Server Orchestration and Amazon SWF Launch, for more [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fault-tolerant execution of their server scaling workflow. Read Thorsten von Eicken&#8217;s post, RightScale Server Orchestration and Amazon SWF Launch, for more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightScale Server Orchestration and Amazon SWF launch by Expanding the Cloud – The Amazon Simple Workflow Service &#124; Weez.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/02/22/rightscale-server-orchestration-and-amazon-swf-launch/#comment-4138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Expanding the Cloud – The Amazon Simple Workflow Service &#124; Weez.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1236#comment-4138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the SDK see the developers guide. As always The AWS developer blog has additional details. At the Rightscale blog Thorsten von Eicken talks about their use of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the SDK see the developers guide. As always The AWS developer blog has additional details. At the Rightscale blog Thorsten von Eicken talks about their use of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightScale Server Orchestration and Amazon SWF launch by Amazon Launches New Hybrid Cloud Friendly Service, But What About Vendor Lock-In? &#124; SiliconANGLE</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/02/22/rightscale-server-orchestration-and-amazon-swf-launch/#comment-4137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amazon Launches New Hybrid Cloud Friendly Service, But What About Vendor Lock-In? &#124; SiliconANGLE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1236#comment-4137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] management company Rightscale is already using Simple Workflow. The big idea here is to help developers architect cloud applications the way companies like [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] management company Rightscale is already using Simple Workflow. The big idea here is to help developers architect cloud applications the way companies like [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightScale Server Orchestration and Amazon SWF launch by SquareCows.com &#187; Amazon Simple Workflow &#8211; Cloud-Based Workflow Management</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/02/22/rightscale-server-orchestration-and-amazon-swf-launch/#comment-4136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SquareCows.com &#187; Amazon Simple Workflow &#8211; Cloud-Based Workflow Management]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1236#comment-4136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] fault-tolerant execution of their server scaling workflow. Read Thorsten von Eicken&#039;s post, RightScale Server Orchestration and Amazon SWF Launch, for more [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fault-tolerant execution of their server scaling workflow. Read Thorsten von Eicken&#039;s post, RightScale Server Orchestration and Amazon SWF Launch, for more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get more out of your cloud with RightScale and Citrix CloudStack 3 by Citrix CloudStack 3為大小企業提供媲美亞馬遜的雲服務TechRitual &#124; TechRitual</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/02/13/get-more-out-of-your-cloud-with-rightscale-and-citrix-cloudstack3/#comment-4134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Citrix CloudStack 3為大小企業提供媲美亞馬遜的雲服務TechRitual &#124; TechRitual]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1265#comment-4134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] RightScale [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RightScale [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get more out of your cloud with RightScale and Citrix CloudStack 3 by Citrix anuncia la disponibilidad de CloudStack 3 &#124; Portal de Noticias de la Revista IT/USERS</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/02/13/get-more-out-of-your-cloud-with-rightscale-and-citrix-cloudstack3/#comment-4125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Citrix anuncia la disponibilidad de CloudStack 3 &#124; Portal de Noticias de la Revista IT/USERS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1265#comment-4125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] RightScale [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RightScale [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Get more out of your cloud with RightScale and Citrix CloudStack 3 by Ethan Robotic</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/02/13/get-more-out-of-your-cloud-with-rightscale-and-citrix-cloudstack3/#comment-4113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethan Robotic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1265#comment-4113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All i&#039;m seeing is cloud computing everywhere. Sites like http://www.dropbox.com, https://www.mypdv.com and so on are storing data inside of them. Then there is sites such as facebook who are taking up huge amounts of data storage. I think it would have been impossible to see such a thing only a few years ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All i&#8217;m seeing is cloud computing everywhere. Sites like <a href="http://www.dropbox.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dropbox.com</a>, <a href="https://www.mypdv.com" rel="nofollow">https://www.mypdv.com</a> and so on are storing data inside of them. Then there is sites such as facebook who are taking up huge amounts of data storage. I think it would have been impossible to see such a thing only a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Phil Cox</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Cox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bryan,
Let me know how it goes. Also, if there is anything I can do to assist, let me know as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bryan,<br />
Let me know how it goes. Also, if there is anything I can do to assist, let me know as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Bryan McGowan</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan McGowan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I too am very excited about the non-root user mapping.  I am also in the midst of home-building an authentication cred distribution system to aviod a huge red flag in a SOC audit.  I&#039;ll try out the 5.8 beta images.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am very excited about the non-root user mapping.  I am also in the midst of home-building an authentication cred distribution system to aviod a huge red flag in a SOC audit.  I&#8217;ll try out the 5.8 beta images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Hot New Releases in Computer Security &#38; Encryption &#171; Frank Tromper</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hot New Releases in Computer Security &#38; Encryption &#171; Frank Tromper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages (rightscale.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages (rightscale.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Hot New Releases in Computer Security &#38; Encryption &#124; The Digital Hit Man</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hot New Releases in Computer Security &#38; Encryption &#124; The Digital Hit Man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages (rightscale.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages (rightscale.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Hot New Releases in Computer Security &#38; Encryption &#124; Books on Privacy</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hot New Releases in Computer Security &#38; Encryption &#124; Books on Privacy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages (rightscale.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages (rightscale.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Hot New Releases in Computer Security &#38; Encryption &#171; Amazon Bestselling Books</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hot New Releases in Computer Security &#38; Encryption &#171; Amazon Bestselling Books]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages (rightscale.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages (rightscale.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Phil Cox</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Cox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel, you can update firewall rules, but there are a number of reasons why I would not do it that way. Might be better to have a conversation on this, as it is very contextual. As for the RightLink agent, and other components of RightScale, sessions are initiated from the instance to RightScale servers. A typical client environment has firewall ingress rules that allow what ever services on the instance they want (i.e., not RightScale related) and egress rules that restrict certain ports (assuming statefull firewall), but typically not to a specific IP. As I stated earlier, it is possible to restrict egress IP as well, and we have a mechanism to do that, but operationally there are potential issues that usually outweigh any potential benefit. 

Again, more than happy to continue the discussion here, but might be more useful in a chat. If you&#039;d like, send me email thesecurityguy at rightscale.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, you can update firewall rules, but there are a number of reasons why I would not do it that way. Might be better to have a conversation on this, as it is very contextual. As for the RightLink agent, and other components of RightScale, sessions are initiated from the instance to RightScale servers. A typical client environment has firewall ingress rules that allow what ever services on the instance they want (i.e., not RightScale related) and egress rules that restrict certain ports (assuming statefull firewall), but typically not to a specific IP. As I stated earlier, it is possible to restrict egress IP as well, and we have a mechanism to do that, but operationally there are potential issues that usually outweigh any potential benefit. </p>
<p>Again, more than happy to continue the discussion here, but might be more useful in a chat. If you&#8217;d like, send me email thesecurityguy at rightscale.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phil, shouldn&#039;t it be easy to update the firewalls rules for the all the servers managed by RightScale automatically anytime RightScale adds or removes the servers?  RightScale platform knows the IP addresses of the servers added or removed to the internal RightScale server pool and also has all the information to connect to all the managed servers to update the firewall rules.  You guys already have the scale and infrastructure to run operational scripts for all servers under RightScale management.  Why auto-scaling of Rightscale instances can’t be configured to automatically update the firewalls rules on all servers managed by RightScale?  Other option is to limit access to the port to a predefined large enough range of Elastic IP pool for RightScale servers in the RightScale primary and DR site.

Looks like we need to configure the firewall to allow transportation of RightAgent related packages.  Without proper management of firewall rules from what you are describing it appear that for the RightAgent to work the communication port used by the RightAgent should be open for traffic in the firewall to be accessible from any IP address in the world!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, shouldn&#8217;t it be easy to update the firewalls rules for the all the servers managed by RightScale automatically anytime RightScale adds or removes the servers?  RightScale platform knows the IP addresses of the servers added or removed to the internal RightScale server pool and also has all the information to connect to all the managed servers to update the firewall rules.  You guys already have the scale and infrastructure to run operational scripts for all servers under RightScale management.  Why auto-scaling of Rightscale instances can’t be configured to automatically update the firewalls rules on all servers managed by RightScale?  Other option is to limit access to the port to a predefined large enough range of Elastic IP pool for RightScale servers in the RightScale primary and DR site.</p>
<p>Looks like we need to configure the firewall to allow transportation of RightAgent related packages.  Without proper management of firewall rules from what you are describing it appear that for the RightAgent to work the communication port used by the RightAgent should be open for traffic in the firewall to be accessible from any IP address in the world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Phil Cox</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Cox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel, you theoretically can limit to known RightScale instances, however you run into a potential issues with auto scaling: If you restrict by IP and we autoscale, then the new systems will not be in your allowed list and could cause a self-induced DoS. Same thing with failover. If a region fails and RightScale has to fail over to a different cloud/region, the ability to manage resources in the Cloud Provider would break until they updated the whitelist.

As far as the “Managed SSH” feature, it does use SSH, but from YOUR system to the instance, not the RightScale core.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, you theoretically can limit to known RightScale instances, however you run into a potential issues with auto scaling: If you restrict by IP and we autoscale, then the new systems will not be in your allowed list and could cause a self-induced DoS. Same thing with failover. If a region fails and RightScale has to fail over to a different cloud/region, the ability to manage resources in the Cloud Provider would break until they updated the whitelist.</p>
<p>As far as the “Managed SSH” feature, it does use SSH, but from YOUR system to the instance, not the RightScale core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blog says &quot;thus the need for ssh port to be accessible on the instance from the RightScale platform usually meant that it was accessible from any IP address.&quot;

Why can&#039;t we limit the ssh port access to only Rightscale trusted servers using firewall for the instance?  Will the &quot;Managed SSH&quot; feature use SSH protocol for communication with the instance or will it use some other mechanism?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blog says &#8220;thus the need for ssh port to be accessible on the instance from the RightScale platform usually meant that it was accessible from any IP address.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t we limit the ssh port access to only Rightscale trusted servers using firewall for the instance?  Will the &#8220;Managed SSH&#8221; feature use SSH protocol for communication with the instance or will it use some other mechanism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Phil</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave,
If you want to be a bit adventurous, there are a couple ways you can get it now :)
Option 1: Get RightLink 5.8
- Fetch the RightLink git repository and follow the README.doc to install RightLink by hand

Option 2: &quot;bleeding edge&quot;
- Point your instances at Tony Spataro&#039;s personal tarball and boot in &quot;tarball mode&quot; (no guarantees that the tarball stays stable, but it works now)
- To do &quot;tarball mode&quot;
  - choose a MultiCloudImage that uses a recent vintage of RightLink (e.g. 5.7). Ubuntu is strongly preferred
  - Tag your server with &quot;rs_agent_dev:package=tony&quot;
  - Launch the server

If you&#039;re playing with it, try doing some sftp and scp commands and look at the audit history. you will be pleasantly surprised.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,<br />
If you want to be a bit adventurous, there are a couple ways you can get it now <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Option 1: Get RightLink 5.8<br />
- Fetch the RightLink git repository and follow the README.doc to install RightLink by hand</p>
<p>Option 2: &#8220;bleeding edge&#8221;<br />
- Point your instances at Tony Spataro&#8217;s personal tarball and boot in &#8220;tarball mode&#8221; (no guarantees that the tarball stays stable, but it works now)<br />
- To do &#8220;tarball mode&#8221;<br />
  &#8211; choose a MultiCloudImage that uses a recent vintage of RightLink (e.g. 5.7). Ubuntu is strongly preferred<br />
  &#8211; Tag your server with &#8220;rs_agent_dev:package=tony&#8221;<br />
  &#8211; Launch the server</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re playing with it, try doing some sftp and scp commands and look at the audit history. you will be pleasantly surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightLink Agent Security Features and Upgrading from V4 RightImages by Dave Morehouse</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/24/rightlink-agent-security-features-and-upgrading-from-v4-rightimages/#comment-4063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Morehouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rightscale.com/?p=1221#comment-4063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t wait for the v5.8 templates and MCIs.  Our company had to implement our own user separation by parsing the authorized_keys file in roots .ssh directory.  I would be very interested in talking with anyone on your team in regards to this feature.  Perhaps we could help identify extra use cases or configuration details.

I had previously requested this feature.  In my mind, this is a huge value add for RightScale.  We had to implement it ourselves as we prepared for a PCI audit and everyone using root to access the box (separate keys or not) was not going to pass the audit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait for the v5.8 templates and MCIs.  Our company had to implement our own user separation by parsing the authorized_keys file in roots .ssh directory.  I would be very interested in talking with anyone on your team in regards to this feature.  Perhaps we could help identify extra use cases or configuration details.</p>
<p>I had previously requested this feature.  In my mind, this is a huge value add for RightScale.  We had to implement it ourselves as we prepared for a PCI audit and everyone using root to access the box (separate keys or not) was not going to pass the audit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Do-It-Yourself Cloud Computing Management Is a Temporary Fad by Adrian Cockcroft</title>
		<link>http://blog.rightscale.com/2012/01/09/why-do-it-yourself-cloud-computing-management-is-a-temporary-fad/#comment-4060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Cockcroft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rightscale.wordpress.com/?p=1074#comment-4060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bit of the Netflix platform that matches up to what Rightscale does was built by one engineer, we added a second engineer recently, and have been able to scale and customize it in a very agile manner. Most of the engineers we have are building much more high level PaaS features, managing Cassandra data sources, integrating monitoring tools and providing 24x7 site reliability engineering.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bit of the Netflix platform that matches up to what Rightscale does was built by one engineer, we added a second engineer recently, and have been able to scale and customize it in a very agile manner. Most of the engineers we have are building much more high level PaaS features, managing Cassandra data sources, integrating monitoring tools and providing 24&#215;7 site reliability engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
