Comments on: Network performance within Amazon EC2 and to Amazon S3 http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/network-performance-within-amazon-ec2-and-to-amazon-s3/ Cloud Management News & Conversations Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:49:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Network performance Within Amazon EC2 and with S3 | user's Blog! http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/network-performance-within-amazon-ec2-and-to-amazon-s3/#comment-1817 Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:41:01 +0000 http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/partners/#comment-1817 [...] Posted on April 15, 2009 by Body: See the post on Right Scale blog with the same heading, i.e. Network performance Within Amazon EC2 and with S3.   Even though the blog post warns about making a conclusion, it seems that in general you can [...]

]]> By: Amazon S3 Performance Report « HostedFTP.com http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/network-performance-within-amazon-ec2-and-to-amazon-s3/#comment-775 Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:15:38 +0000 http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/partners/#comment-775 [...] maximum throughput (around 50 MB/s) you can expect when using S3 is discussed here. Since we actively load balance our instances we don’t anticipate that this had any impact on [...]

]]> By: Thorsten http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/network-performance-within-amazon-ec2-and-to-amazon-s3/#comment-712 Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:35:52 +0000 http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/partners/#comment-712 Daniel, the above tests were done before Amazon introduced availability zones, so we didn’t have control over that at the time. I don’t actually think there’s much difference in bandwidth either way. (Latency, yes, probably more difference)

]]> By: Daniel http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/network-performance-within-amazon-ec2-and-to-amazon-s3/#comment-711 Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:52:11 +0000 http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/partners/#comment-711 nice article.
where the two ec2 instances in the same availability zone?

]]> By: Amazon EC2 Network and S3 performance | Cloudiquity http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/network-performance-within-amazon-ec2-and-to-amazon-s3/#comment-709 Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:09:48 +0000 http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/partners/#comment-709 [...] to EC2 and other than some vague figures there is very little documented. The guys at RighScale did some tests for EC2-EC2 bandwidth and EC2-S3 bandwidth which is very informative. To test EC2-EC2 large [...]

]]> By: Thorsten http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/network-performance-within-amazon-ec2-and-to-amazon-s3/#comment-534 Mon, 03 Nov 2008 05:34:26 +0000 http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/partners/#comment-534 alexu: that doesn’t sound right, you should get more, but we haven’t tried this on the windows machines. Sorry for not having a better answer, I recommend the EC2 forum…

]]> By: alexu http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/network-performance-within-amazon-ec2-and-to-amazon-s3/#comment-520 Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:35:28 +0000 http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/partners/#comment-520 Hmmm. I can only get around 200KB/sec download speed using between new Windows EC2 boxes and S3. Any ideas if this is expected?

]]> By: blanquer http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/network-performance-within-amazon-ec2-and-to-amazon-s3/#comment-209 Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:13:54 +0000 http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/partners/#comment-209 Francois,

We are aware of MB and Mb, and there is no mixup. The presented numbers are in Mega Bytes per second.

]]> By: Francois http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/network-performance-within-amazon-ec2-and-to-amazon-s3/#comment-139 Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:00:38 +0000 http://blog.rightscale.com/2007/10/28/partners/#comment-139 You probably mixed up bytes and bits in your article.

MB/s means MegaBytes per second
Mb/s means MegaBits per second

]]>